By Dimitris Dalakoglou & Yannis Kallianos
Anthropology touched upon infrastructures and their theoretical potentialities for the discipline in the 1960s and 1970s (Harris 1968; Godelier et al. 1978). Although the anthropological approach to infrastructures has always been distinct, these first infrastructural perspectives still drew upon the classical materialist social theory. As a result of this genealogy, infrastructures have commonly been considered, within social sciences, to be primarily connected to the material, economic and political spheres, rather than to the social one. This ‘anti-social’ understanding is reflected in ideas about infrastructures as stable and neutral technological systems leading to an everyday experienced normality that is so prevalent in the European infrastructural ideal. However, what the ethnographic approaches to infrastructures of recent years are showing is that if such ideas are ever relevant, they are mostly relevant in very few contexts, usually among the privileged global classes or in places with explicit infrastructural fetishism like post-socialist frameworks (Simone 2004; Edwards 2003; Larkin; Dalakoglou and Harvey 2014). In places where people are experiencing disruptions in infrastructural networks, infrastructures are much more ‘visible’ and are perceived as social and much less neutral technological elements (Dalakoglou 2009; Chu 2014; Dalakoglou and Kallianos 2014). At the other end, more recent work suggests that lack of reliability is always embedded in infrastructures (Dalakoglou 2009; Soppelsa 2009), yet it often just becomes more apparent during times of crisis. The fragility that characterizes infrastructures is also reflected when, for example, one studies ethnographically the people behind the production of infrastructures, such as engineers, as they almost always take the unreliability of infrastructures as a given element of the process (Harvey and Knox 2011). Indeed, one could argue that such practices could potentially simply be ‘black-boxing’ by experts and specialists in an antagonistic relationship between technology practitioners and politicians on the one side, and common people on the other (Star and Bowker 2006). However, these roles of expertise might be imaginary, as it is not a rare phenomenon for the experts to be absent from the actual production and daily function of infrastructure systems, which instead function thanks to the work of mundane low-rank, skilled or unskilled agents (Dalakoglou and Kallianos 2014; Dalakoglou and Kallianos. Forthcoming). All the above echoes a relatively banal but relevant statement: infrastructures are socio-technologicalelements that tend to embody ‘congealed social interests’ (Graham and Marvin 2001; Graham 2010). Although it is a cliché, if this statement becomes a parameter for the approach of IG, a unique window to a major theoretical paradigm shift is opened. Within this context—to put it schematically—soft and hard infrastructures do not produce socio-cultural superstructures, but socio-cultural superstructure produces infrastructural formations. So what are primarily social processes such as sharing, peer-to-peer production, ideas of the commons and solidarity are becoming the new force behind the organization and function of novel forms of infrastructures. Nevertheless, things are complicated. Such an approach to an extent attempts to turn the classical materialist scheme on its head, and opens up a series of very crucial questions that need to be answered. For instance, what are the relationships between soft and hard infrastructures under current circumstances, and what can we potentially learn about covering the IG of hard infrastructures by the way that soft IG is covered? This also opens up to potentialities of a new radically different definition of infrastructures which needs to study and take into account at least two parameters which mutate infrastructure during the crisis in Europe: first, as realms of social and political contestation—with a focus on hard infrastructures within the context of crisis, economic meltdown and political implosion; and second, as sites of socio-technological innovation with the potentiality of articulating new and alternative governance and socio-economic networks focusing on grassroots structures and self-organized initiatives. For the first time in recent Western history, we are also witnessing the pragmatic and theoretical potential of infrastructures not only to be run by the people themselves, but to become a new type of socio-centric, socio-technological hybrid forums and agoras (Callon, Lascoume, and Barthes 2001). Bibliography Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chu, Julie Y. 2014. "When Infrastructures Attack: The Workings of Disrepair in China." American Ethnologist 41(2): 351-367. Dalakoglou, Dimitris. 2009. An Anthropology of the Road. PhD thesis, University of London (UCL). Dalakoglou, Dimitris, Penny Harvey, and eds. 2014. Roads and Anthropology. London: Routledge. Dalakoglou, Dimitris, and Yannis Kallianos. 2014. "Infrastructural Flows, Interruptions and Stasis in Athens of the Crisis." City 18(4-5): 526-532. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2014.939473. Dalakoglou, Dimitris., and Yannis Kallianos. Forthcoming. “Rethinking Infrastructures.” Article under progress. Edwards, Paul N. 2003. “Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems.” In Modernity and Technology, eds. Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, pp. 185-225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Godelier, Maurice, Maurice Bloch, Henri JM Claessen, David D. Gilmore, Oriol Pi-Sunyer, and Zoltán Tagányi. 1978. "Infrastructures, Societies, and History [and Comments]." Current Anthropology 19(4): 763-771. Graham, Stephen, ed. 2010. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. Routledge. Graham, Stephen, and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Psychology Press. Harris, Marvin. 2001. Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. AltaMira Press. Knox, Hannah, and Penny Harvey. 2011 "Anticipating Harm: Regulation and Irregularity on a Road Construction Project in the Peruvian Andes." Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 142-163. Larkin, Brian. 2013. "The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure." Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327-343. Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. "People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg." Public Culture 16(3): 407-429. Soppelsa, Peter S. 2009. The Fragility of Modernity: Infrastructure and Everyday Life in Paris, 1870-1914. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan. Star, Susan Leigh, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2010. “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, pp. 230-245. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22 Comments
26/9/2018 11:25:28
Upon the infrastructures there are many obvious thing which lies and we should be having idea about them. It is all about making the right calculation which is telling all the connected material indeed.
Reply
17/2/2019 09:41:15
Youre so cool! I don’t suppose I’ve read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. really thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!
Reply
18/5/2020 10:30:47
Reply
25/9/2020 10:45:05
I appreciate what you folks are up as well. This sort of shrewd work and inclusion! Keep up the extraordinary works folks I've added you folks to my own blogroll.
Reply
24/9/2021 05:38:16
Greetings! Very useful advice within this article! It is the little changes that will make the biggest changes. Thanks for sharing! Check Out
Reply
28/1/2022 06:41:56
Very elegantly composed. This blog has every one of the necessary parts that I was searching for. The focuses are all around featured, expressing the genuine importance. Straightforward and read.
Reply
28/1/2022 07:48:08
At the present time it seems like Drupal is the top writing for a blog stage out there this moment. (from what I've perused) Is that what you're utilizing on your blog?
Reply
7/5/2022 21:34:26
Our expert designers are dedicated to producing layouts that ensure your design is distinctive to our clients' liking as well as functional. We warmly invite you to browse our website or visit our freshly remodeled showroom to witness for yourself how Cabinet & Stone City can provide luxury without the cost!
Reply
7/5/2022 21:37:26
We are a full-service trucking company established worldwide to add convenience and pace in freight transportation for commercial purposes. Maintaining the safest driving records on the road.
Reply
7/5/2022 21:39:46
Fame Jackets have so far served many of customers and thus we can claim to have customers wearing our jackets throughout the world. To make sure smooth and efficient shipping and delivery solutions Fame Jackets collaborate with the premium courier services working internationally.
Reply
27/10/2022 08:03:46
Dynamite work! This is the kind of data that ought to be shared around the net. Disgrace on the web indexes for not situating this post higher! Come on finished and visit my site.
Reply
25/12/2023 19:04:30
Hi my friend! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and include almost all vital infos. I would like to see extra posts like this.
Reply
27/12/2023 16:41:04
I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day.
Reply
2/9/2024 09:39:02
I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day.
Reply
8/3/2025 14:28:58
Interesting perspective on how infrastructures are traditionally viewed! It’s always fascinating to see how different disciplines approach the topic. If you ever need roofing services, feel free to check out our site!
Reply
8/3/2025 14:30:12
Thank you for sharing this insight! The connection between infrastructure and social aspects is definitely worth exploring. By the way, if you’re ever in need of roofing services, don’t hesitate to visit our website!
Reply
6/4/2025 12:23:56
Thank you for shedding light on how anthropology connects with infrastructures—really thought-provoking! If you ever need roofing services, feel free to check out our website.
Reply
6/4/2025 12:25:57
I appreciate this unique perspective on the theoretical side of infrastructure in anthropology. By the way, if you're looking for reliable roof work, our site is always open!
Reply
7/4/2025 16:25:02
Thank you for shedding light on this! The anthropological view really adds depth to how we think about infrastructures. If you ever need roof services, feel free to visit our site!
Reply
7/4/2025 16:26:30
Interesting perspective—I've never thought of infrastructure this way before. Thanks for sharing! And if you're looking for any roofing help, our website is always open!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Authorinfra-demos Archives
January 2022
Categories |